[From nobody Fri May 17 13:42:48 2024 Return-path: <ripe-list-bounces@ripe.net> Envelope-to: shane@time-travellers.org Delivery-date: Wed, 01 May 2024 12:07:59 +0000 Received: from pikapika.ripe.net ([2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1315]) by saturn.zonnestelsel.tk with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ripe-list-bounces@ripe.net>) id 1s28ke-0001MT-2N for shane@time-travellers.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 12:07:59 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ripe.net; s=massmailer20240129; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Subject:MIME-Version:Message-ID:From:To:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner:List-Unsubscribe-Post; bh=StZdubTR0UEcTXuU1ISTBecq8JE89oc6ih3FZ8NRSWg=; b=T5AMF0iJo8rXGPo+tFRP+gDosQ IzPhn3dUnWGr5sSn7fI9G6C1lF66f6n748qLaEweIk1F//gsnWcHus3V+K2TxjhsU+uC1rhoKWKnE OkBvdcg2qNpFANWbKq8K4FgwjOSY1R5/LAdBsOcvhGBCl0/n9ltd5JydLJ3lHSJkOiPSXtt3Tyhut SIU+5H7z5vNEd365jY87CmbntAdoBtQDyDf/Aknlnl7nNuYqI9hKf2MrGJfJ9VaIchaUxyz4qJgKU K8aFaXyognce4tXodUYKW44CPy5xmrMUtMZwb5GBxq+SVQuRRlMfH0eJBLavi36buP0EZFcvQ1iFm nFWDcKLg==; Received: from [2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1325] (helo=chouchou.ripe.net) by pikapika.ripe.net with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from <ripe-list-bounces@ripe.net>) id 1s28k0-000000005zk-1Of5; Wed, 01 May 2024 12:07:16 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=chouchou.ripe.net) by chouchou.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from <ripe-list-bounces@ripe.net>) id 1s28jz-000000001Wj-2xmm; Wed, 01 May 2024 14:07:16 +0200 Received: from mail-mx-2.ripe.net ([2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1312]) by chouchou.ripe.net with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from <mir@zu-hause.nl>) id 1s28iM-0000000054Y-22v4; Wed, 01 May 2024 14:05:34 +0200 Authentication-Results: mail-mx-2.ripe.net; iprev=pass (mail-4317.proton.ch) smtp.remote-ip=185.70.43.17; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=zu-hause.nl; dkim=pass header.d=zu-hause.nl header.s=protonmail header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=zu-hause.nl Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch ([185.70.43.17]:14283) by mail-mx-2.ripe.net with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from <mir@zu-hause.nl>) id 1s28iJ-000000070FL-1rah for ripe-list@ripe.net; Wed, 01 May 2024 12:05:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zu-hause.nl; s=protonmail; t=1714565130; x=1714824330; bh=wC0HcP8yEf8Q9owr82kkNng5j5SAjCErcL/FRk7pYHE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=OyvYtJ02TAtJI1lX/en8OdniCCRT+AQD3ZXGr322R6IKqQaeUS/tkhYKoY+rJkHvA UtvhZMuhwO9z5aK7tdH22W6hZcGCGod0mOXUstsJ97bwAvesbrRf+2yM4SDJBHrPds 5092KAg9VIIQkNhRebx7b3jcUuQTR84yZC64yYq5jHksDHFQyC/CYbeNb/3KaslMEh n0HDZ7bBoIQR0TW31rWzs1Phb323ZQBo037H6XEir1GK8xaWQs/PDBdWBk/ShtDu2V +Y16dEXYLee0P6dyh2HXgeaQEIJBETu4WwBsLremQe/DCUFTWNvYC7N+VrZVO0DitY I9nC5Bq33/DyQ== Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 12:05:27 +0000 To: RIPE List <ripe-list@ripe.net> From: Mirjam Kuehne <mir@zu-hause.nl> Message-ID: <81b42d0f-398d-4fbb-b0a3-8f738169150d@zu-hause.nl> Feedback-ID: 23438061:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: a993384ce3ac0d8d820987dd12584003d3c6cacc MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RIPE-Signature: bbe5c05a6d3f4032888d6d8ca8dbb89341ab3423a8fcb10ff20b5c83c51da173 X-RIPE-Spam-Level: / X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -0.2 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [185.70.43.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 May 2024 14:07:14 +0200 Subject: [ripe-list] DNS Resolver Recommendations Published (ripe-823) X-BeenThere: ripe-list@ripe.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: RIPE-related general announcements and discussions <ripe-list.ripe.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/ripe-list>, <mailto:ripe-list-request@ripe.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/> List-Post: <mailto:ripe-list@ripe.net> List-Help: <mailto:ripe-list-request@ripe.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-list>, <mailto:ripe-list-request@ripe.net?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: ripe-list-bounces@ripe.net Sender: "ripe-list" <ripe-list-bounces@ripe.net> X-Spam-Score: -7.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: -69 X-Spam-Bar: ------- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "saturn.zonnestelsel.tk", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dear colleagues, I am happy to inform you that the RIPE DNS Resolver Best Common Practice Task Force [1] finished its work and published a set of recommendations and best current practices for operators of DNS resolve [...] Content analysis details: (-7.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [2001:67c:2e8:11:0:0:c100:1315 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy RGVhciBjb2xsZWFndWVzLAoKSSBhbSBoYXBweSB0byBpbmZvcm0geW91IHRoYXQgdGhlIFJJUEUg RE5TIFJlc29sdmVyIEJlc3QgQ29tbW9uIFByYWN0aWNlIApUYXNrIEZvcmNlIFsxXSBmaW5pc2hl ZCBpdHMgd29yayBhbmQgcHVibGlzaGVkIGEgc2V0IG9mIHJlY29tbWVuZGF0aW9ucyAKYW5kIGJl c3QgY3VycmVudCBwcmFjdGljZXMgZm9yIG9wZXJhdG9ycyBvZiBETlMgcmVzb2x2ZXJzIC0gbm93 IAphdmFpbGFibGUgYXMgUklQRSBEb2N1bWVudCA4MjM6CgpodHRwczovL3d3dy5yaXBlLm5ldC9w dWJsaWNhdGlvbnMvZG9jcy9yaXBlLTgyMy8KCkkgd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byB0YWtlIHRoaXMgb3Bw b3J0dW5pdHkgdG8gdGhhbmsgYWxsIHRhc2sgZm9yY2UgbWVtYmVycyAKZm9yIHRoZWlyIGNvbnRy aWJ1dGlvbnMgdG8gdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBhbmQgZXNwZWNpYWxseSBTaGFuZSBLZXJyIHdobyAK Y2hhaXJlZCB0aGUgZ3JvdXAgYW5kIGVuc3VyZWQgdGhhdCBwcm9ncmVzcyB3YXMgbWFkZSBhbmQg dGhhdCBhbGwgCmZlZWRiYWNrIHdhcyBoZWFyZCBhbmQgY29uc2lkZXJlZCBieSB0aGUgdGFzayBm b3JjZS4KCktpbmQgcmVnYXJkcywKTWlyamFtIEvDvGhuZQpSSVBFIENoYWlyCgpbMV0gVGhlIFJJ UEUgRE5TIFJlc29sdmVyIEJlc3QgQ29tbW9uIFByYWN0aWNlIFRhc2sgRm9yY2UKaHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cucmlwZS5uZXQvY29tbXVuaXR5L3RmL2Rucy1yZXNvbHZlci1iZXN0LWNvbW1vbi1wcmFjdGlj ZS10YXNrLWZvcmNlLyAKCgoKLS0gCgpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBmcm9tIHRoaXMgbWFpbGluZyBs aXN0LCBnZXQgYSBwYXNzd29yZCByZW1pbmRlciwgb3IgY2hhbmdlIHlvdXIgc3Vic2NyaXB0aW9u IG9wdGlvbnMsIHBsZWFzZSB2aXNpdDogaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5yaXBlLm5ldC9tYWlsbWFuL2xp c3RpbmZvL3JpcGUtbGlzdAo=]